| |
For release: Nov. 14, 2003
| Contacts: |
Joe Elstner |
| |
Office: |
(314) 444-8902 |
| |
E-mail: |
joseph.c.elstner@stls.frb.org |
| |
Mobile: |
(314) 640-3526 |
| |
|
| |
Charles Henderson |
| |
Office: |
(314) 444-8311 |
| |
E-mail: |
charles.b.henderson@stls.frb.org |
| |
Mobile: |
(314) 609-5972 |
| |
Pager: |
(314) 538-9526 |
|
| Online Press Room: |
www.stlouisfed.org/news/press_room/contact.html |
|
Globalization of Financial Markets Creates New Investment Opportunities
For U.S., Foreign Investors: St. Louis Fed’s Poole
Link to
speech.
Tuscon, Ariz. — Financial market globalization,
spurred by advancing technology and liberalization of capital flow
restrictions worldwide, has created entirely new investment opportunities
for investors in the United States and abroad. These opportunities
have led to a rebalancing of portfolios, and the likely possibility
that this process is associated with a net export of claims on U.S.
assets — a capital account surplus.
William Poole, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
made those points and others today in remarks to the Association
for Investment Management Research.
“U.S. financial markets are among the most highly developed
in the world, offering efficiency, transparency and liquidity,”
said Poole. “Moreover, the U.S. dollar serves as both a medium
of exchange and a unit of account in many international transactions.
Our advantages include the promise of a good return, safety, secure
political institutions, liquidity and an enormous depth of financial
expertise.”
Poole said that for some purposes, it’s useful to think
of U.S. financial markets as a world financial intermediary. “Just
as a bank or mutual fund channels the savings of many individuals
toward productive investments, the U.S. financial markets play a
similar role for investors around the world.”
According to Poole, another force at work may be a “gradual
breakdown in the home bias to investment.” He noted that for
some years, there has historically been a home bias in asset portfolios,
with investors’ holdings weighted more toward domestic assets
than proponents of diversification would recommend. “A balanced
international portfolio can help to diversify risk,” said
Poole. “The opening of global capital markets has allowed
investors to exploit these opportunities, particularly foreign investors
who are able to participate in the relative openness of U.S. capital
markets and the multinational diversification of U.S. corporations.”
When considering widening external imbalances like those the United
States has seen in recent years, said Poole, it’s natural
to ask whether those trends are sustainable. “Indeed with
a current account deficit equal to 5 percent of GDP and a negative
international investment position equal to 25 percent of GDP, some
have drawn comparisons with countries like Argentina, Brazil and
Mexico at times of severe balance of payments crises,” he
said. “I consider it highly unlike that such a crisis will
befall the United States. As a stable, diversified
industrial economy, we’re not likely to suffer from a sudden
lack of investor confidence.” He noted that among other successful
economies, Australia’s debt reached 60 percent of GDP in the
mid-1990s, Ireland’s exceeded 70 percent in the 1980s, and
New Zealand’s reached nearly 90 percent of GDP in the late
1990s.
“The international capital markets view suggests that the
United States is not only more like those countries that have experienced
high debt levels without obvious ill effects, but that the U.S.
case is, in some sense, unique,” Poole said. “The central
role of U.S. financial markets—and of the dollar—in
the world economy suggests that capital account surpluses are being
driven by foreign demand for U.S. assets rather than by any structural
imbalance in the U.S. economy itself.”
Poole said that the United States has created for itself a comparative
advantage in capital markets, and “we should not be surprised
that investors all over the world come to buy the product.”
# # #
Back to top |