| |
For release: May 3, 2006
St. Louis Fed Analysis Looks at Why States Adopt Lotteries
St. Louis, Mo. — States that have higher per
capita incomes are more likely to adopt a lottery, while opposition
from some religious groups tends to inhibit states from adopting
a lottery, based on an analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis.
Those are just two of the conclusions from an article in the May/June
issue of the Review, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis'
bimonthly publication of economic and business issues. The authors
of the analysis are the St. Louis Fed's Cletus C. Coughlin, deputy
director of research, research officer Thomas A. Garrett and senior
economist Rubén Hernández-Murillo. The publication
is also available online at the St. Louis Fed's web site: http://www.stlouisfed.org.
Since New Hampshire introduced the first modern, state-sponsored
lottery in 1964, 41 states and the District of Columbia have followed.
Lottery ticket sales in the United States in 2004 topped $48 billion,
with state governments reaping nearly $14 billion in net lottery
revenues. Coughlin, Garrett and Hernández-Murillo reviewed
geographical, economic and political factors to analyze whether—and
when—a state institutes a lottery.
"The spread of state lotteries," they said, "coincides
with changing attitudes toward legalized gambling, growing state
and local government expenditures, and growing public opposition
to both new taxes and increased rates for existing taxes."
Coughlin, Garrett and Hernández-Murillo identified four
main factors to explain states' adoption of a lottery:
- The higher the income per capita, the more likely a
state is to adopt a lottery. Coughlin, Garrett and Hernández-Murillo
noted evidence which suggests that those with low incomes bear
a relatively higher tax lottery burden than those with high incomes.
For example, one study they cited provided data to show that low-income
groups spend a larger share of their incomes on the lottery and
that they also spend more in absolute terms.
- A state is more likely to adopt a lottery if a neighboring
state already has one. Prior to North Carolina's passage
of a lottery, for example, it was estimated that the state's residents
were spending $100 million per year on Virginia's lottery. "Legislators
and residents concluded that if residents were going to play the
lottery, they would prefer that the spending and resulting tax
revenues be kept within their state," said Coughlin, Garrett
and Hernández-Murillo.
- A state is more likely to adopt a lottery in an election
year than in non-election years. The economists referenced
one study that argued that lotteries tend to be adopted in election
years relative to other years because a lottery, compared to other
types of tax increases, is generally more popular—a fact
that elected officials are aware of and likely attempt to use
to their advantage.
- Opposition from certain religious groups, especially
in Southern states, has inhibited lottery adoption. Generally
speaking, the most strident opposition from religious groups is
based on the belief that gambling is immoral. Other issues typically
raised by opposition groups are deceptive advertising, the regressivity
of the lottery tax, and the prospects for gambling-related problems.
With branches in Little Rock, Louisville and Memphis, the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis serves the Eighth Federal Reserve District,
which includes all of Arkansas, eastern Missouri, southern Indiana,
southern Illinois, western Kentucky, western Tennessee and northern
Mississippi. The St. Louis Fed is one of 12 regional Reserve banks
that, along with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., comprise
the Federal Reserve System. As the nation’s central bank,
the Federal Reserve System formulates U.S. monetary policy, regulates
state-chartered member banks and bank holding companies, and provides
payment services to financial institutions and the U.S. government.
# # #
Back to top |