|

Send a
letter.
Back to
list of letters. |
April 2005 Issue—So Much for That Merit
Raise: The Link between Wages and Appearance
 |
So Much for That Merit
Raise letter #2 |
| |
|
| Author: |
Marie-Claire Arsenault, of
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, a social development officer
for the Canadian government |
| |
|
| Date Posted: |
June 27, 2005 |
| |
|
| Comments: |
I loved the article by Kristie M. Engemann
and Michael T. Owyang, which looked at the link between appearance
and wages. I have a related question that these researchers might
be able to help me with, since there may be a correlation. Are wealthy
people better looking than the average?
I have a major bet on your answer to this question.
Thank you.
|
| |
|
| Editor's Note: |
As much as we would like to help you
with your bet, I’m afraid that there are no useful data that
would allow us to answer your question directly. If wealth and earnings
were highly correlated, then one could surmise that wealth and looks
are related in the same way that earnings and looks are. Wealth
and income are, however, not that strongly correlated. A study published
by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis notes that the correlation
between earnings and wealth is a “surprisingly low”
0.23. (Javier Díaz-Giménez, Vincenzo Quadrini and
José-Víctor Ríos-Rull. “Dimensions of
Inequality: Facts on the U.S. Distributions of Earnings, Income,
and Wealth.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly
Review, Spring 1997, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp 3-21.)
|
Back to top.
 |
So Much for That Merit
Raise letter #1 |
| |
|
| Author: |
A. Scherf, a computer engineer
in Huntington Beach, Calif. |
| |
|
| Date Posted: |
June 27, 2005 |
| |
|
| Comments: |
Your analysis leans toward anti-discrimination
laws as a “solution” to favoritism for good looks.
Think of it more simply, like this: People like to work for, and
do business with, good-looking people. We don’t want to spend
our lives around ugly people. We don’t want laws that force
ugly people upon us. It’s good for everybody to try to look
good via exercise, diet, proper dress, manners, etc. Studies would
probably also show that polite people make more money than rude
people; do you think we need anti-discrimination laws to protect
rude people, too?
There are too many laws and regulations on the books already. Let
the free market decide these things. In the end, everybody wins
when government keeps its big butt out and lets people discriminate.
Discrimination is not a bad thing.
Discrimination is one of the most important, powerful senses of
perception that humans have. We discriminate constantly, all day
long, every day of our lives. Without discrimination, our quality
of life and standard of living would be much worse. We discriminate
in the people and businesses we choose to interact with, the merchandise
we select, the place we live. Virtually every decision we make involves
discrimination!
People should keep discriminating against people who are ugly,
rude, lazy, stupid, etc., and the world will be a much better place! |
| |
|
| Editor's Note: |
The source of your impression that
the article leans toward anti-discrimination laws is difficult to
find in the article itself. In fact, the last paragraph of the article
notes that anti-discrimination laws might not work. There may, however,
have been some discussions in the press that gave this impression. |
Back to top.
|